Zamknij [x]
Korzystanie z witryny oznacza zgodę na wykorzystanie plików cookie z których niektóre mogą być już zapisane w folderze przeglądarki
Więcej informacji można znaleźć w Polityce prywatności i wykorzystywania plików cookies w serwisie

Uwaga! To jest strona archiwalna UOKiK. Aktualna strona znajduje się pod adresem: uokik.gov.pl

UOKiK - Urząd Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów

Powiększ czcionkęPomniejsz czcionkęWersja z wysokim kontrastemWersja tekstowaWersja tekstowaKanał RSSPobierz kod QREnglish version

Tu jesteś: Strona główna > Produkty > Dla konsumentów > Powiadomienia przedsiębiorców o produktach niebezpiecznych

UOKiK's report - Public procurement

< poprzedni | następny > 13.09.2013

UOKiK's report -  Public procurement

A limited access to tenders, colluding bidders, contractors favoured by ordering parties – to name the most common restrictions to competition in public procurement, presented in the latest report of UOKiK. How to improve the bidding system operating in Poland? The debate held at the premises of UOKiK will address this question

In 2012, the value of public procurement in Poland was approx. PLN 132.7 billion, i.e. about 8.32% of gross domestic product. The Office of Competition and Consumer Protection is one of institutions responsible for the proper spending of money collected from tax payers. Most importantly, however, the Office is in charge of detecting bid rigging in the following relations: between bidders, and between an ordering party and a bidder. Over the last few years, the Office has issued 15 decisions concerning bid rigging; 13 antimonopoly proceedings are still pending.

However, the Office goes further beyond – e.g. UOKiK made the analysis of public procurement system, which resulted in drawing up the report titled System zamówień publicznych, a rozwój konkurencji w gospodarce (Public procurement system and the growth of competition in the market). The report presents regulations relating both to tenders in Poland and EU member states,  indicating  some drawbacks in the functioning of the Polish public procurement system, and possible solutions. Bidders and tender callers may find the information on what practices are regarded as competition-resticting very essential.

Bid rigging

Within the scope of competence of UOKiK, bid rigging is the most significant problem faced by the system of public procurement in Poland. They may take various shapes – most frequently, decisions issued by the Office include a mechanism of placing and withdrawing bids by colluding entities. It consists in withdrawal of a bid by a contractor offering a lower price when the first two places are taken by colluding bidders, which means in practice that the next offer in a row – offering the higher price – is selected.

Price       

Moreover, the Office addressed the problem of selecting a bidder only based on the price offered by such tenderer. – When a price is the only criterion, it negatively affects the competiveness of a tender – stressed Małgorzata Krasnodębska-Tomkiel, the President of UOKiK. – It eliminates the effective rivalry between undertakings who are not capable of winning the price rivalry, despite the fact their product or service are much more favourable for other reasons. It may lead to selecting an offer which after its evaluation is not the most favourable for tax payers. Furthermore, it results in tender collusions. In the case only one criterion determines the selection of an offer, entering prohibited agreements is much more likely – added the President of UOKiK. It is worth noting that taking a price as the only criterion  is not a common practice abroad. This way of dealing tenders refers to only 30% of bids in Europe, whereas in Poland – as much as 90%.

Proposed amendments

Detection of bid rigging will become more effective thanks to changes in law started by UOKiK. In July, the Council of Ministers adopted the draft amendment to the Act on competition and consumer protection, which assumes expanding the limitation period in cases concerning collusions (including bid rigging) from 1 to 5 years.

Moreover, the Office proposed amendments to the Public Procurement Law to limit the risk of entering into prohibited agreements. One of them consists in restricting the access to submitted bids. This will eliminate the most common cases of collusions, i.e. placing or withdrawing bids. For this reason the Office implies that contractors should be allowed to access only the detailed content of the most favourable offer.

Another raised issue relates to changes which will lead to excluding from tenders these undertakings whose participation in bid rigging has been proved.

Debate

The report of the Office will be discussed in detail during the debate held at the premises of UOKiK on 10th September. Representatives of institutions responsible for the proper functioning of the public procurement system, as well as heads of businesses and public procurement granting entities will join the debate.

Additional information for media:
Małgorzata Cieloch, Spokesperson of UOKiK
Department of International Relations and Communication
Pl. Powstańców Warszawy 1, 00-950 Warsaw
Tel.: +48 22 827 28 92, 55 60 314, 55 60 430
Fax: +48 22 826 11 86
E-mail: [SCODE]bWFsZ29yemF0YS5jaWVsb2NoQHVva2lrLmdvdi5wbA==[ECODE]

 

  • Refers to public procurement published in the Public Procurement Bulletin and the Official Journal of the EU

Pliki do pobrania

 

Warto przeczytać

PZPN i Ekstraklasa zmieniają praktyki
PZPN i Ekstraklasa zmieniają praktyki

Po interwencji Prezesa UOKiK, PZPN i  Ekstraklasa SA zmieniły swoje praktyki, które mogły stanowić nadużywanie pozycji dominującej.   ...>

Autocentrum AAA Auto - dwie decyzje Prezesa UOKiK
Autocentrum AAA Auto - dwie decyzje Prezesa UOKiK

Prezes UOKiK Tomasz Chróstny wydał dwie decyzje w sprawie AUTOCENTRUM AAA AUTO – łączna kara to ponad 72 mln zł. ...>

Tucz kontraktowy - dwie decyzje zobowiązujące
Tucz kontraktowy - dwie decyzje zobowiązujące

Po interwencji UOKiK poprawi się sytuacja producentów trzody chlewnej w systemie tuczu kontraktowego.   ...>

Nowe decyzje i postępowania Prezesa UOKiK w sprawie zatorów płatniczych
Nowe decyzje i postępowania Prezesa UOKiK w sprawie zatorów płatniczych

Prezes UOKiK Tomasz Chróstny nałożył kary w łącznej kwocie prawie 8 mln zł na spółki Volkswagen Poznań i Solaris Bus & Coach za tworzenie zatorów płatniczych.   ...>

Decyzja Prezesa UOKiK - kara dla CANAL+
Decyzja Prezesa UOKiK - kara dla CANAL+

Prezes UOKiK nałożył ponad 46 mln zł kary na CANAL+ Polska oraz nakazał zwrot środków konsumentom. ...>

Wakacje.pl - decyzja Prezesa UOKiK
Wakacje.pl - decyzja Prezesa UOKiK

Prezentowane na stronie wakacje.pl ceny wielu wycieczek były nieaktualne lub niepełne – inna cena pokazywała się w wyszukiwarce, a inna po rozwinięciu szczegółów oferty.   ...>

 

  
  

Aby być na bieżąco z aktualnymi informacjami możesz takze pobrać najnowsze wiadomości z kategorii Powiadomienia przedsiębiorców o produktach niebezpiecznych za pomocą kanałów RSS.
 

Do góry