Zamknij [x]
Korzystanie z witryny oznacza zgodę na wykorzystanie plików cookie z których niektóre mogą być już zapisane w folderze przeglądarki
Więcej informacji można znaleźć w Polityce prywatności i wykorzystywania plików cookies w serwisie

Uwaga! To jest strona archiwalna UOKiK. Aktualna strona znajduje się pod adresem: uokik.gov.pl

UOKiK - Urząd Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów

Powiększ czcionkęPomniejsz czcionkęWersja z wysokim kontrastemWersja tekstowaWersja tekstowaKanał RSSPobierz kod QREnglish version

Tu jesteś: Strona główna > Urząd > Informacje ogólne > Aktualności

Conditional consent - UPC and Aster

< poprzedni | następny > 05.09.2011

Conditional consent - UPC and Aster

The President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection has issued her consent to the transaction between two companies providing chargeable cable tv services. The concentration may be implemented under specified conditions. Most importantly, it should not restrict subscribers in their choice of the operator in the area where the option was available beforehand. Furthermore, it cannot be onerous to subscribers

According to the decision, UPC Polska is allowed to take control over Aster under the condition it will resell a part of network belonging to Aster in the buildings where till now the services were provided by both companies. The transaction must be performed within 18 months from the date of its issuance and refers to the territory of Cracow and Warsaw

On 7th Decemeber 2010 UPC applied to UOKiK for granting the consent to take control over Aster. Both companies provide chargeable cable tv services, access to the braodband Internet and the stationary telephony. As the combined turnover of undertakings participating in the transaction exceeded the equivalent of EUR 1 billion, the concentration was subject to notification to the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection.

During the antimonopoly proceedings, the Office noticed that Aster and UPC Polska were visibly the two most powerful undertakings providing chargeable cable tv services in Cracow and Warsaw. It is confirmed most of all by combined market share of the two companies, ranging from 50 to 60 percent in each of the cities, which is much more than assumed in the antitrust law (40 percent refers to obtaining a dominant position). According to the antitrust authority, the transaction would result in a significant restriction of competition on the market of chargeable television and the access to the stationary broadband Internet in the area of the two cities, which would definitely be harmful to the recipients. The concentration may result in a situation where the acquiring entity may become a dominant entity and thus could provide less favourable offers than before (in particular by resigning from fight for attracting customers with a competitive offer). Furhermore, the entity would not run the risk of losing its own subscribers. Having conducted the market enquiry, in which the Office examined opinions of competitors and housing associations, and armed with the evidence collected in the case, the President of UOKiK issued a conditional consent.

Internet, television, radio

According to the decision, UPC Polska is allowed to take control over Aster under the condition it will resell a part of network belonging to Aster in the buildings where till now the services were provided by both companies. The transaction must be performed within 18 months from the date of its issuance and refers to the territory of Cracow and Warsaw. The resale must cover the undertakings out of the capital group of the acquiring entity, after obtaing the acceptance of UOKiK. Taking into consideration the technical aspects of the concentration and the consumer welfare, the President of the Office additionally committed UPC Polska to provide subscribers with services of the right quality and continuity at the time of transaction performance. Moreover, after the concentration, the customers of Aster in the building where the service is provided also by UPC Polska, shall be vested the right to choose the provider once again, regardless of the conditions of agreements concluded with Aster before.

The acquiring undertaking was obliged to provide the Office with information on the way of fulfilling the imposed commitment in the time limits specified in the decision. The decision is not final. The entity may lodge an appeal to the Court of Competition and Consumer Protection.

When assessing the concentration, the President of the Office may prohibit the transaction, issue a consent to the implementation of the concentration, or make it conditional upon the fulfilment of additional obligations by the undertaking. Since the year 2004, this has been the 13th decision obliging the undertaking notifying a transaction to fulfil commitments. This year this is the second case (out of 101 issued decisions) when the green light is given upon the fulfilment of specified obligations by the undertakings.

Additional information for media:
Małgorzata Cieloch, Spokesperson for UOKiK
Department of International Relations and Communication
Pl. Powstańców Warszawy 1, 00-950 Warszawa
Tel. 22 827 28 92, 55 60 314
faks 22 826 11 86
E-mail: malgorzata.cieloch@uokik.gov.pl

 

Pliki do pobrania

 

Warto przeczytać

PZPN i Ekstraklasa zmieniają praktyki
PZPN i Ekstraklasa zmieniają praktyki

Po interwencji Prezesa UOKiK, PZPN i  Ekstraklasa SA zmieniły swoje praktyki, które mogły stanowić nadużywanie pozycji dominującej.   ...>

Autocentrum AAA Auto - dwie decyzje Prezesa UOKiK
Autocentrum AAA Auto - dwie decyzje Prezesa UOKiK

Prezes UOKiK Tomasz Chróstny wydał dwie decyzje w sprawie AUTOCENTRUM AAA AUTO – łączna kara to ponad 72 mln zł. ...>

Tucz kontraktowy - dwie decyzje zobowiązujące
Tucz kontraktowy - dwie decyzje zobowiązujące

Po interwencji UOKiK poprawi się sytuacja producentów trzody chlewnej w systemie tuczu kontraktowego.   ...>

Nowe decyzje i postępowania Prezesa UOKiK w sprawie zatorów płatniczych
Nowe decyzje i postępowania Prezesa UOKiK w sprawie zatorów płatniczych

Prezes UOKiK Tomasz Chróstny nałożył kary w łącznej kwocie prawie 8 mln zł na spółki Volkswagen Poznań i Solaris Bus & Coach za tworzenie zatorów płatniczych.   ...>

Decyzja Prezesa UOKiK - kara dla CANAL+
Decyzja Prezesa UOKiK - kara dla CANAL+

Prezes UOKiK nałożył ponad 46 mln zł kary na CANAL+ Polska oraz nakazał zwrot środków konsumentom. ...>

Wakacje.pl - decyzja Prezesa UOKiK
Wakacje.pl - decyzja Prezesa UOKiK

Prezentowane na stronie wakacje.pl ceny wielu wycieczek były nieaktualne lub niepełne – inna cena pokazywała się w wyszukiwarce, a inna po rozwinięciu szczegółów oferty.   ...>

 

  
  

Do góry